{"id":2420,"date":"2026-08-24T02:32:25","date_gmt":"2026-08-23T17:32:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ninetailsgold-fox.jp\/ja\/blog\/?p=2420"},"modified":"2026-08-24T02:32:25","modified_gmt":"2026-08-23T17:32:25","slug":"%e7%84%a1%e4%ba%8b%e3%82%92%e7%a5%88%e3%82%8b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ninetailsgold-fox.jp\/ja\/blog\/2026\/08\/%e7%84%a1%e4%ba%8b%e3%82%92%e7%a5%88%e3%82%8b\/","title":{"rendered":"\u7121\u4e8b\u3092\u7948\u308b"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u7121\u4e8b\u3092\u7948\u308b<\/h1>\n

I pray for you.<\/p>\n

You are my life.<\/p>\n

Survive it all.<\/p>\n

And show me that smile of yours, one without tremor.<\/p>\n

And I will be here in Japan, waiting.<\/p>\n

Again, again, again, I want to see you.<\/p>\n

I cannot lose you. You are my life.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u4e2d\u56fd\u6b66\u6f22\u3067\u6d41\u884c\u3057\u3060\u3057\u305f\u60aa\u75ab\u306f<\/p>\n

\u4e2d\u56fd\u5171\u7523\u515a\u306e\u96a0\u853d\u304c\u306a\u3051\u308c\u3070\u3001<\/p>\n

\u4e5d\u5272\u306e\u6b7b\u8005\u306e\u6570\u306f\u6e1b\u3063\u305f\u3068\u306e\u7814\u7a76\u7d50\u679c\u304c\u3042\u308b\u304c\u3001<\/p>\n

\u6642\u306f\u9045\u304d\u306b\u5931\u3057\u3066\u3057\u307e\u3072\u3001<\/p>\n

\u305f\u3089\u308c\u3070\u3092\u8a00\u3063\u3066\u3090\u308b\u72b6\u6cc1\u3067\u306f\u306a\u3044\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u304a\u308c\u304c\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u3001<\/p>\n

\u7948\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306e\u307f\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u300c\u8d85\u5927\u56fd\u306e\u5927\u7d71\u9818\u3092\u6144\u304b\u305b\u308b\u306e\u3067\u75db\u5feb\u3060\u300d\u3068\u8a00\u3063\u305f\u65b0\u805e\u7de8\u96c6\u59d4\u54e1\u304c\u3090\u305f\u304c\u3001<\/p>\n

\u305d\u3093\u306a\u306b\u4eba\u304c\u6b7b\u306c\u306e\u304c\u75db\u5feb\u306a\u306e\u3060\u3089\u3046\u304b\u3002<\/p>\n

\u4f53\u5236\u6279\u5224\u304c\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u306e\u3067\u3042\u308c\u3070\u3001<\/p>\n

\u7121\u8f9c\u306e\u4eba\u304c\u3044\u304f\u3089\u6b7b\u306a\u3046\u304c\u304a\u69cb\u3072\u306a\u3057\u306e\u3053\u306e\u7de8\u96c6\u59d4\u54e1\u306f<\/p>\n

\u8a18\u8005\u306e\u98a8\u4e0a\u306b\u3082\u7f6e\u3051\u305a\u3001\u672c\u4eba\u306e\u304a\u8a6b\u3073\u3082\u306a\u304f\u3001SNS\u306e\u30a2\u30ab\u30a6\u30f3\u30c8\u3092\u524a\u9664\u3057\u3066\u96f2\u96a0\u308c\u3057\u305f\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

WHO\u3082\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u306b\u4f55\u3082\u8a00\u3078\u305a\u3001<\/p>\n

\u3053\u306e\u60aa\u75ab\u3092\u6700\u521d\u306bWHO\u306b\u7167\u4f1a\u3057\u305f\u53f0\u6e7e\u304c\u4eca\u4ee5\u3066WHO\u306b\u52a0\u5165\u3067\u304d\u306a\u3044\u3002<\/p>\n

\u3042\u3089\u3046\u3053\u3068\u304b\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u306f\u3053\u306e\u60aa\u75ab\u306f\u7c73\u56fd\u304c\u6b66\u6f22\u3067\u767a\u751f\u3055\u305b\u305f\u3082\u306e\u306a\u3069\u3068<\/p>\n

\u4e16\u8ff7\u3072\u8a00\u3092\u8a00\u3072\u51fa\u3057\u3001<\/p>\n

\u4ee4\u548c\u516b\u5e74\u4e09\u6708\u5341\u4e8c\u65e5\u306b\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u306f\u514b\u670d\u3057\u305f\u3068\u5ba3\u3072\u3001<\/p>\n

\u4ed6\u56fd\u3092\u6551\u3078\u308b\u306e\u306f\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u306e\u307f\u3068\u6551\u4e16\u4e3b\u9762\u3092\u3057\u51fa\u3059\u59cb\u672b\u3002<\/p>\n

\u305d\u308c\u306f\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u304c\u759a\u3057\u3044\u6545\u306e\u8cac\u4efb\u9003\u308c\u306b\u8d70\u308a\u59cb\u3081\u305f\u8a3c\u5de6\u3067\u3042\u308a\u3001<\/p>\n

Pandemic\u304c\u4f55\u3068\u304b\u4eba\u9593\u306e\u7d71\u5236\u4e0b\u306b\u306a\u3063\u305f\u6681\u306b\u306f\u3001<\/p>\n

\u4e2d\u56fd\u5f53\u5c40\u306f\u65ad\u3058\u3066\u7cfe\u5f3e\u3055\u308c\u306d\u3070\u306a\u3089\u306c\u7b48\u3067\u3042\u308b\u304c\u2026\u2026\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u305d\u306e\u4e2d\u3067<\/p>\n

\u30d5\u30e9\u30f3\u30b9\u306b\u9003\u308c\u305f\u543e\u304c\u611b\u3059\u308b\u4eba\u306e\u3053\u3068\u304c\u6c17\u61f8\u304b\u308a\u3067\u4ed5\u65b9\u304c\u306a\u3044\u3002<\/p>\n

\u6b27\u5dde\u306f\u4eca\u3001\u4e3b\u6226\u5834\u3068\u5316\u3057<\/p>\n

\u3055\u305e\u304b\u3057\u3001\u611b\u3059\u308b\u4eba\u306f\u6050\u6016\u306b\u6226\u3044\u3066\u3090\u308b\u3002<\/p>\n

\u5f7c\u5973\u3082\u3053\u306e\u671f\u306b\u53ca\u3093\u3067\u306f\u3001<\/p>\n

\u3058\u305f\u3070\u305f\u3057\u3066\u3082\u59cb\u307e\u3089\u306c\u3068<\/p>\n

\u601d\u3072\u59cb\u3081\u305f\u306e\u304b\u3001<\/p>\n

\u5916\u51fa\u7981\u6b62\u4e0b\u3067\u306e\u30b9\u30de\u30db\u8d8a\u3057\u306e\u7b11\u9854\u306f\u30bf\u30a4\u30e0\u30e9\u30b0\u3067\u9045\u308c\u3066\u5c4a\u304f\u3002<\/p>\n

\u5185\u5fc3\u306f\u5f15\u304d\u6523\u3063\u3066\u3090\u308b\u306e\u306f\u30bf\u30a4\u30e0\u30e9\u30b0\u304c\u306a\u304f\u4f1d\u306f\u308b\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u304a\u308c\u304c\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u3001<\/p>\n

\u7948\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306e\u307f\u3002<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I pray for you.<\/p>\n

You are my life.<\/p>\n

Survive it all.<\/p>\n

And show me that smile of yours, one without tremor.<\/p>\n

And I will be here in Japan, waiting.<\/p>\n

Again, again, again, I want to see you.<\/p>\n

I cannot lose you. You are my life.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Claude-Opus-5\u306e\u6279\u8a55<\/h1>\n
\n

Thinking...<\/em><\/p>\n

I'm looking at a prose piece from 2020 about COVID-19 and personal circumstances involving China and France, and the user wants detailed critique. The piece makes some contested claims about the pandemic's origins and Chinese government response, plus criticism of a newspaper editorial\u2014I should be thoughtful about how to engage with the factual disputes while still providing substantive feedback on the writing itself. Taiwan was excluded from the WHA starting in 2017, though it had observer status from 2009 to 2016\u2014that checks out. The claims about China's pandemic response and mask diplomacy in spring 2020 are accurate. For the newspaper editorial incident, I'm trying to pin down which specific case the piece is referencing\u2014there are several documented instances of Japanese newspaper editors making controversial statements on social media that were later deleted, but I need to verify which one matches the \"\u8d85\u5927\u56fd\u306e\u5927\u7d71\u9818\u3092\u6226\u304b\u305b\u308b\" and \"\u75db\u5feb\" framing to assess whether this particular anecdote is accurately represented. I'm searching for specific details about the WHO observer status issue and Zhao Lijian's statements regarding the US military and Wuhan, along with the dates involved. I'm also noticing the original text has inconsistent classical and modern Japanese grammar \u2014 mixing historical kana usage with contemporary forms, and some odd verb constructions that don't quite fit standard usage. Continuing through the orthographic consistency check: most entries follow the historical kana usage correctly, though there are a few edge cases to consider\u2014like \u300c\u6226\u3044\u3066\u3090\u308b\u300dwhich uses the classical form of \u6226\u304f (to tremble), and some borderline modern constructions that still work within the historical framework.<\/p>\n

The main issues I'm spotting are the inconsistent handling of the geminate consonant marker\u2014sometimes it's the small tsu \u300c\u3063\u300d and other times the full \u300c\u3064\u300d, particularly in instances like \u300c\u8a00\u3063\u3066\u3090\u308b\u300d and \u300c\u5f15\u304d\u6523\u3063\u3066\u3090\u308b\u300d, and then \u300c\u8a00\u3063\u305f\u300d versus \u300c\u8a00\u3064\u305f\u300d. There's also an inconsistency with how the foreign term \"Pandemic\" is being glossed\u2014the first instance has the katakana annotation but the second one doesn't, and the parenthesis styles are mixing half-width and full-width characters in a way that breaks the typographic consistency of the Japanese text.<\/p>\n

The deeper structural problem is that the piece promises a prayer in its title but delivers mostly geopolitical commentary, leaving the emotional core\u2014the personal connection and the smile\u2014compressed into just a handful of lines after twenty lines of editorial critique. There's also an ironic tension building: the narrator criticizes the newspaper editor for weaponizing mass death for political gain, but then risks doing the same thing by spending most of the poem on the polemic rather than the prayer itself.<\/p>\n

The strongest defense would be if the political anger were explicitly causally linked to her being in danger\u2014right now \"\u305d\u306e\u4e2d\u3067\" is the only bridge, which feels too thin. What's needed is a clearer \"because she's at risk, I'm angry\" connective tissue. And the most powerful moment in the whole piece is that image of her smile arriving with a time delay through the phone screen. I should keep both instances of \u30bf\u30a4\u30e0\u30e9\u30b0 since the repetition drives the point home, but tighten the Japanese phrasing by shifting \"\u5f7c\u5973\u304c\u5185\u5fc3\u306f\" to \"\u5185\u5fc3\u306e\u5f15\u304d\u6523\u308a\u306f\" for cleaner syntax. For the English ending, \"beautiful\" dulls the impact since the Japanese already captured the smile's complexity; I'd strip it down to \"show me your smile again\" or \"show me your smile, the real one\" for more punch.<\/p>\n

The word \"again\" is getting overused and needs pruning \u2014 it appears twice in the preceding lines, then gets tripled in \"Again, again, again, I want to see you,\" which dilutes the incantation effect. I should remove \"again\" from the earlier lines so the triple repetition lands harder. Also, \"I cannot miss you\" is a translation error that flips the meaning; it should be \"I cannot lose you\" to match the intended sense of unbearable longing or refusal to be separated. The structural discipline is already working \u2014 Japanese maintains third person throughout, English never mentions China. Now I need to audit the factual claims for accuracy: the statement about China's concealment causing the pandemic is overstated. The evidence suggests earlier transparency would have dramatically reduced the scale \u2014 studies show interventions even weeks earlier could have prevented 66-95% of cases. The timeline matters too: Li Wenliang's reprimand in late December, the human-to-human admission by mid-January, Wuhan's lockdown by late January. The concealment claim is well-documented locally, though I should be precise about the scope and timing.<\/p>\n

For the US origin claim, I need to verify Zhao Lijian's March 2020 tweet date. Taiwan's exclusion from WHO is a concrete detail worth emphasizing \u2014 they were observers through 2016, excluded from 2017 onward, and their December 31 warning to WHO is a stronger factual anchor than vague language. The mask diplomacy angle is emerging as another thread to develop.<\/p>\n

Looking at the timeline more carefully: Tedros praised China's transparency on January 28-30, declared PHEIC on January 30, then delayed the \"pandemic\" designation until March 11. Trump's national emergency declaration on March 13 and WHO naming Europe as the epicenter that same day help date this piece to mid-to-late March 2020. I should verify the newspaper editor reference and note that this is fundamentally a dated document \u2014 its historical moment matters.<\/p>\n

For the personal section about the girlfriend, I'm seeing that the current phrasing relies too much on speculation (\"\u3055\u305e\u304b\u3057\u6050\u6016\u306b\u6226\u3044\u3066\u3090\u308b\"). The France lockdown began March 17 with the attestation de d\u00e9placement d\u00e9rogatoire requirement, and Macron's \"nous sommes en guerre\" speech was March 16 \u2014 these concrete details would be far stronger than conjecture. I should replace the weak imaginative line with something specific she actually experienced: waiting in a queue at the supermarket, filling out the attestation form, seeing empty streets. That's where the real power lies.<\/p>\n

Now I need to verify several facts: the editor incident, Zhao Lijian's statement date, the Southampton study numbers, Taiwan's WHO alert from December 31, 2019, Macron's speech and France's confinement date, and the WHO Europe epicenter statement. I'll run parallel searches to confirm these details, being careful to handle any private individuals neutrally and focusing on public statements and documented events.<\/p>\n

I'm verifying an incident involving an Asahi Shimbun editor who posted a controversial tweet about COVID-19 in March 2020, where they characterized the virus as somewhat gratifying given its global impact and effect on world powers. The newspaper apologized the following day, revoked the editor's social media credentials, and the editor subsequently deleted the tweet.<\/p>\n

I'm noting a precision point: the article states the individual apologized without explanation (\"\u304a\u8a6b\u3073\u3082\u306a\u304f\"), which is technically accurate about the individual themselves, though the company did issue an apology on March 14. Now I'm moving on to verify several other key events: a Southampton study on early intervention effectiveness, Taiwan's December 31, 2019 notification to the WHO and observer status, France's confinement date and Macron's \"we are at war\" statement, and the WHO's declaration of Europe as the epicenter on March 13.<\/p>\n

The searches for those specific claims aren't turning up reliable sources, so I need to be cautious about citing exact figures without verification. I'll try a few more targeted searches for the Southampton study findings, the Taiwan-WHO warning from late December, and Macron's March 16 speech to see if I can find better documentation.<\/p>\n

I found the Southampton study verification I was looking for\u2014Lai et al. showed that interventions at 1, 2, and 3 weeks earlier reduced cases by 66%, 86%, and 95% respectively in their March 2020 preprint. For Taiwan and the WHO, I couldn't confirm the details through search, but based on what I know, Taiwan participated as an observer at the World Health Assembly from 2009 to 2016 before being excluded in 2017, and Taiwan claims to have sent an email to the WHO's IHR focal point on December 31st.<\/p>\n

Now I need to write a detailed critique for this writer. I'm structuring it with a strong opening verdict, then moving through the structural issues\u2014particularly the imbalance between the title's promise and what the body delivers\u2014and then diving into the core problem: the mirror dynamic where the text mirrors the criticized editor's approach of using disaster as political ammunition, but the crucial difference is that the writer's stake is a person's life, not just political denunciation. I'll use headers and bold for emphasis, keeping it organized and decisive.<\/p>\n

For the factual verification section, I'm building a table that checks three major claims: first, the overreach about coverup causing the pandemic\u2014I'll suggest replacing it with the Southampton model percentages which strengthens the argument; second, the editor's details which are mostly verified but need precision about whether the apology came from the person or the institution; and third, an idiom correction for the phrase about the reporter's conduct. The key insight is that a current-affairs reader will catch the distinction between the person's silence and the organization's apology, so precision matters here. I'm noting the parallel structure issue between the personality judgment and factual statement. For the WHO section, I should replace the vague phrasing with specific dates\u2014the PHEIC declaration on January 30 and the pandemic announcement on March 11. For Taiwan, I need to add the December 31, 2019 email claim with appropriate hedging about observer status. Rather than using vague language about Zhao Lijian's statements, I should name him directly and cite his March 12, 2020 tweet. I'm also tracking the mask diplomacy angle with Italy and Serbia in March 2020, and noting that WHO identified Europe as the epicenter.<\/p>\n

For the origin question, I'm shifting from \"occurred in Wuhan\" to \"first confirmed in Wuhan\" since that's factually unassailable. I need to date the document itself based on internal evidence pointing to mid-to-late March 2020. Now I'm moving into a copyediting pass\u2014checking for inconsistencies in small tsu usage, variations in how \"pandemic\" is written, bracket formatting, and a verb conjugation issue where the causative form might mislead readers into parsing it differently than intended. The phrasing \"\u305d\u308c\u306b\u5bfe\u3057\u3066\u304a\u308c\u304c\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306f\u3068\u3044\u3075\u3068\" feels too colloquial for the formal tone; tightening it to \"\u304a\u308c\u306b\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u306e\u306f\u3001\u7948\u308b\u3053\u3068\u306e\u307f\u3002\" would be stronger. I'm noticing that the first-person \"\u304a\u308c\" appears only here, after twenty lines of impersonal commentary \u2014 which actually works well as a moment where the narrator's voice enters precisely when she does. That's worth highlighting as an unintentional strength, then making it deliberate by checking for other self-references. There's an inconsistency though: both \u543e and \u304a\u308c appear as first-person markers in different registers, so I should recommend either unifying them or deliberately exploiting that contrast \u2014 using \u543e for the public voice and \u304a\u308c for the personal moment.<\/p>\n

Now moving to the English section: \"I cannot miss you\" is the critical error and needs both interpretations explained with alternatives offered. The word \"again\" repeats four times and dilutes the impact, so restructuring would help. \"Beautiful\" flattens the language while \"Survive it all\" lands well. The closing \"You are my life\" bookends the piece effectively, though it reads as J-pop English \u2014 a clich\u00e9 in English song lyrics. The question is whether to replace it or keep it precisely because that register shift to plainness serves the point, but I should flag that awareness for the writer.<\/p>\n

The placement of \"again\" in the final line needs fixing. I should propose a revised ending and justify the code-switching strategy: Japanese addresses the world, English addresses her specifically. The English section's discipline is notable \u2014 no political content \u2014 and crucially, there's no mention of China, which is actually the piece's strongest structural choice and suggests the writer understands the distinction between the two languages' purposes rather than treating them as mirrors.<\/p>\n

For revision, I'll sketch the architecture rather than fully rewrite: present the block order, offer a concrete revised English coda, and suggest an opening line. Then I'll prioritize the fixes: first the \"I cannot miss you\" error, then the causal sentence, the pandemic assertion, and the geminate consonant issue.<\/p>\n

Looking at the progression of \"\u3055\u305e\u304b\u3057\u2026\u3060\u3089\u3046\" through to the final lines \u2014 imagining her fear, observing her resignation, then sensing her inner trembling \u2014 there's actually a coherent three-step movement. The shift from conjecture to observation (\u63a8\u91cf\u2192\u89b3\u5bdf) works well, but I should clarify that the middle step about resignation seems to interrupt the flow.<\/p>\n

The real issue is that she never speaks in this piece. Thirty lines describing her smile, her physical reactions, her supposed thoughts \u2014 but no actual words from her. The text ends with him speaking to her in English, so it's entirely his voice, his interpretation. If she were to read this, she'd see herself only as an object being described and prayed over. Even one line of her actual speech would fundamentally change the dynamic. That's a significant gap worth addressing.<\/p>\n

There's also the weight of \"\u9003\u308c\u305f\" \u2014 fled from what exactly? Japan? A situation? The ambiguity might be intentional, protective even, but that word carries a connotation of fleeing something bad. It creates an unexamined irony too: she fled to France, which then became the epicenter of the crisis. That tension \u2014 \u300c\u9003\u308c\u305f\u5148\u304c\u4e3b\u6226\u5834\u306b\u306a\u3063\u305f\u300d\u2014 is almost there in the text but never articulated. And there's a geopolitical irony lurking underneath: he's criticizing China for the pandemic while the person he loves is in France, tracing that chain from Wuhan through Europe to her.<\/p>\n

I'm also noticing \"\u60aa\u75ab\" appears five times in twenty lines \u2014 it's an archaic choice that fits the \u65e7\u4eee\u540d style, but the repetition is heavy. Worth deciding whether to vary it or let it function as an incantation. The piece is substantial and well-organized, so I'll draft a response with a sources note. I should address where the political claims lack support and where the rhetoric might undermine credibility with readers, without being preachy about it.<\/p>\n

The text uses \"\u4e2d\u56fd\" as an undifferentiated agent rather than distinguishing between the government, the Communist Party, and local authorities \u2014 but his own argument about not politicizing innocent deaths implies that Wuhan residents are also victims. If he separated \u4e2d\u56fd\u653f\u5e9c from \u4e2d\u56fd\u4eba, the piece would be internally consistent and actually stronger rhetorically. That's the deepest structural critique: he condemns the editor for treating people as political material, yet treats \"China\" as a monolith that collapses that distinction.<\/p>\n

I'm planning to write this up in modern Japanese with headers, tables, and bold formatting \u2014 around 1800-2500 words. I also notice his long modifier chain in \u300c\u4f53\u5236\u6279\u5224\u304c\u51fa\u6765\u308b\u306e\u3067\u3042\u308c\u3070\u3001\u7121\u8f9c\u306e\u4eba\u304c\u3044\u304f\u3089\u6b7b\u306a\u3046\u304c\u304a\u69cb\u3072\u306a\u3057\u306e\u3053\u306e\u7de8\u96c6\u59d4\u54e1\u306f\u300d\u2014 the subject is too far from its predicate, so splitting that 44-character clause would improve clarity.<\/p>\n

The real insight is that \u300c\u99ac\u9e7f\u306a\u300d is the weakest word choice here \u2014 it's the same cheap register he criticized in the tanka, which creates a beautiful callback to his earlier point about \u300c\u3072\u308a\u3064\u304f\u300d. Rather than matching his language to the editor's level, the strongest move is to quote the tweet directly and let it condemn itself. No adjective needed when the evidence speaks for itself.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u300e\u7121\u4e8b\u3092\u7948\u308b\u300f\u6279\u8a55<\/h1>\n

\u7d50\u8ad6\u3092\u5148\u306b<\/h2>\n

\u3053\u306e\u6587\u7ae0\u306b\u306f\u3001\u4e00\u7d44\u3060\u3051\u3001\u4ed6\u306e\u5168\u884c\u3068\u8cea\u304c\u9055\u3046\u4e8c\u884c<\/strong>\u304c\u3042\u308a\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

\u30b9\u30de\u30db\u8d8a\u3057\u306e\u5f7c\u5973\u306e\u7b11\u9854\u306f\u30bf\u30a4\u30e0\u30e9\u30b0\u3067\u9045\u308c\u3066\u5c4a\u304f\u3051\u308c\u3069\u3082
\n\u5f7c\u5973\u304c\u5185\u5fc3\u306f\u5f15\u304d\u6523\u3063\u3066\u3090\u308b\u306e\u306f\u30bf\u30a4\u30e0\u30e9\u30b0\u304c\u306a\u304f\u4f1d\u306f\u308b<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u305d\u3057\u3066\u81f4\u547d\u7684\u306a\u8aa4\u308a\u304c\u4e00\u7b87\u6240<\/strong>\u3042\u308a\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

**\"I cannot miss you.\" \u306f\u300c\u541b\u3092\u604b\u3057\u304f\u601d\u3046\u3053\u3068\u304c\u3067\u304d\u306a\u3044\u300d\u3068\u8aad\u3081\u307e\u3059\u3002**\u610f\u56f3\u306e\u9006\u3067\u3059\u3002\u5f7c\u5973\u306f\u82f1\u8a9e\u3082\u582a\u80fd\u306a\u306e\u3067\u3001**\u5fc5\u305a\u6c17\u3065\u304d\u307e\u3059\u3002**\u3057\u304b\u3082\u3053\u3053\u306f\u6700\u7d42\u884c\u3001\u611f\u60c5\u306e\u9802\u70b9\u3067\u3059\u3002<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u3055\u3089\u306b\u69cb\u9020\u306e\u554f\u984c\u304c\u4e00\u3064\u3002**\u984c\u306f\u300c\u7121\u4e8b\u3092\u7948\u308b\u300d\u3067\u3059\u304c\u3001\u672c\u6587\u306e\u7d04\u4e03\u5272\u306f\u6642\u4e8b\u8a55\u8ad6\u3067\u3059\u3002**\u3057\u304b\u3082\u2014\u2014\u3053\u3053\u304c\u6700\u3082\u75db\u3044\u2014\u2014**\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u7cfe\u5f3e\u3057\u3066\u3044\u308b\u7de8\u96c6\u59d4\u54e1\u3068\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u81ea\u8eab\u306e\u6587\u7ae0\u306e\u69cb\u9020\u304c\u3001\u93e1\u306b\u306a\u3063\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002**\u2161\u7bc0\u3067\u8aac\u660e\u3057\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

\n

\u2160 \u300c\u99ac\u9e7f\u306a\u300d\u3068\u66f8\u3044\u305f\u77ac\u9593\u306b\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f\u8ca0\u3051\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059<\/h2>\n

\u524d\u56de\u3001\u79c1\u306f\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306e\u77ed\u6b4c\u2460\u3092\u300c\u300e\u3072\u308a\u3064\u304f\u300f\u3067\u6e08\u307e\u3059\u304b\u300d\u3068\u8a55\u4fa1\u3057\u307e\u3057\u305f\u3002\u6279\u8a55\u5bb6\u304c\u501f\u308a\u7269\u306e\u5b89\u3044\u8a9e\u3067\u6e08\u307e\u305b\u305f\u3053\u3068\u3078\u306e\u6012\u308a<\/strong>\u304c\u3001\u3042\u306e\u9996\u306e\u82af\u3067\u3057\u305f\u3002<\/p>\n

\u305d\u306e\u540c\u3058\u4eba\u304c\u3001\u3053\u3053\u3067**\u300c\u99ac\u9e7f\u306a\u65b0\u805e\u7de8\u96c6\u59d4\u54e1\u300d**\u3068\u66f8\u3044\u3066\u3044\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

\u300c\u99ac\u9e7f\u306a\u300d\u306f\u300c\u3072\u308a\u3064\u304f\u300d\u3068\u540c\u3058\u968e\u5c64\u306e\u8a9e\u3067\u3059\u3002\u624b\u57a2\u304c\u3064\u3044\u3066\u3044\u3066\u3001\u4f55\u3082\u6307\u3057\u3066\u3044\u306a\u3044\u3002<\/strong>\u76f8\u624b\u306e\u7f6a\u306f\u8a00\u8449\u306e\u5931\u6557<\/strong>\uff08\u300c\u75db\u5feb\u300d\u3068\u3044\u3046\u4e00\u8a9e\u3092\u9078\u3093\u3060\u3053\u3068\uff09\u306a\u306e\u306b\u3001\u3042\u306a\u305f\u306f**\u8a00\u8449\u3067\u5fdc\u3058\u305a\u306b\u7f75\u5012\u3067\u5fdc\u3058\u305f\u3002**\u8ad6\u4e89\u306e\u5834\u3067\u3001\u3053\u308c\u306f\u76f8\u624b\u306b\u683c\u3092\u4e0e\u3048\u307e\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

**\u6700\u5f37\u306e\u624b\u306f\u3001\u5f15\u7528\u3059\u308b\u3053\u3068\u3067\u3059\u3002**\u5b9f\u969b\u306e\u30c4\u30a4\u30fc\u30c8\uff082020\u5e743\u670813\u65e5\uff09\u306f\u3053\u3046\u3067\u3057\u305f\u3002<\/p>\n

\u300c\u3042\u3063\u3068\u3044\u3046\u9593\u306b\u4e16\u754c\u4e2d\u3092\u5e2d\u5dfb\u3057\u3001\u6226\u4e89\u3067\u3082\u306a\u3044\u306e\u306b\u8d85\u5927\u56fd\u306e\u5927\u7d71\u9818\u304c\u6050\u308c\u6144\u304f\u3002\u65b0\u30b3\u30ed\u30ca\u30a6\u30a4\u30eb\u30b9\u306f\u3001\u3042\u308b\u610f\u5473\u3067\u75db\u5feb\u306a\u5b58\u5728\u304b\u3082\u3057\u308c\u306a\u3044\u3002\u300d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u3053\u308c\u3092\u4e38\u3054\u3068\u5f15\u3051\u3070\u3001\u5f62\u5bb9\u8a5e\u306f\u4e00\u3064\u3082\u8981\u308a\u307e\u305b\u3093\u3002<\/strong>\u300c\u6226\u4e89\u3067\u3082\u306a\u3044\u306e\u306b\u300d\u3068\u3044\u3046\u524d\u7f6e\u304d\u304c\u81ea\u5206\u3067\u5893\u7a74\u3092\u6398\u3063\u3066\u3044\u308b\u2014\u2014\u6226\u4e89\u3067\u306f\u306a\u3044\u304b\u3089\u6b7b\u8005\u3092\u5a2f\u697d\u306b\u3057\u3066\u3088\u3044\u3001\u3068\u3044\u3046\u8ad6\u7406<\/strong>\u304c\u9732\u51fa\u3057\u3066\u3044\u308b\u3002\u3042\u306a\u305f\u304c\u300c\u99ac\u9e7f\u306a\u300d\u306e\u4e09\u5b57\u3067\u6f70\u3057\u3066\u3057\u307e\u3063\u305f\u306e\u306f\u3001\u3053\u306e\u81ea\u58ca\u306e\u97f3<\/strong>\u3067\u3059\u3002<\/p>\n

\u63a8\u5968\uff1a<\/strong><\/p>\n